David Brooks on the Generativity Revolution
|
The New York Times' David Brooks issues a rousing call to action for the encore generation in his column today.
Under the headline, "The Geezers' Crusade," Brooks calls for a social movement of older adults on behalf of younger people.
"Spontaneous social movements can make the unthinkable thinkable, and they can do it quickly, Brooks writes. "It now seems clear that the only way the U.S. is going to avoid an economic crisis is if the oldsters take it upon themselves to arise and force change."
Such changes are already afoot in the private sphere, Brooks says, citing research that "seniors who perform service for the young have more positive lives and better marriages than those who don’t." Studies of older adults helping children improve their reading through Experience Corps bear this out as well.
Other examples abound. Over the past four years, The Purpose Prize has received more than 4,000 nominations from people who are devoting the second half of their working lives to issues like education, youth development, the homeless, health care innovation, responding to disasters in places like Haiti or war-ravaged countries like Rwanda, creating a green economy and more.
Brooks is calling for public policy to institutionalize such "generativity" (providing for future generations). He cites reports from the Brookings Institution that the federal government spends $7 on the elderly for each $1 spent on children and notes that rising pension costs in many states are squeezing education spending. Rising deficits and taxes driven by mandatory spending on Medicare and Social Security mean less growth and fewer opportunities for future generations, he says.
Smart policy can forge an intergenerational alliance out of this apparent generational conflict. Support for encore careers that help the next generation succeed can improve the well-being of both groups. A mobilization of older adults to transform schools, as teachers, tutors and mentors, could reduce dropout rates and bolster science and math education. An army of encore "health navigators" holds promise to both improve health and reduce costs. All hands on deck - as contractors, managers and trainers - are required to retrofit our buildings for energy efficiency and speed the transition to a clean-energy economy and create good jobs for all ages.
Employers could follow the lead of IBM, which launched the Transition to Teaching program to help its senior engineers and technicians shift into math and science teaching, or Hewlett-Packard, which helped pilot the Encore Fellowship, enabling early retirees to launch second careers with youth or environmental organizations.
Community colleges are developing relatively quick, convenient and inexpensive ways for those who want to go back to school to become teachers or nurses or to work in the green-collar sector.
"It may seem unrealistic - to expect a generation to organize around the cause of nonselfishness," Brooks concludes. "But in the private sphere, you see it every day. Old people now have the time, the energy and, with the Internet, the tools to organize."
Let us know what you're doing to organize "the Generativity Revolution."
- David Bank's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- by David Bank





David Brooks Disrespects Seniors
Is Encore so hard up that it has to use a negative column by David Brooks to start a sale’s pitch? First, the Brooks article made a terrible claim that the federal government spends far more money on seniors than on youth. That, primarily, is because it is the STATES that spend most of the money on schools, youth programs, etc. for the youth, while it is the FEDERAL government that in 1935 enacted a program for the financial support of retirees and the elderly. Second, the Brooks article infers that retirees/seniors are a drain the the U.S. economy that adds to the federal debt. Nothing could be farther fromt the truth. Social Security has always more than paid for itself. The SS Trust Fund currently has about $2.4 trillion in it. That is trillion with a “T”.
Retirees/seniors need David Brooks like a hole in the head. Maybe that is true for Encore, as well.
Generativity/Reverse-Generativity
“Generativity” costs time, money and energy. This is true whether the work is social or financial, and whether workers are volunteers, employees, or entrepreneurs. David Brooks’ column suggests that the older working generation should walk away from Social Security and Medicare, and continue to build the social and financial strength of future generations.
Following a significant recession that has impacted older workers hardest, Mr. Brooks has picked an interesting time to call for abandoning programs that would support the transition to encore careers. Marc Friedman offers a positive response at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marc-freedman/generativity-revolution_b_44....
Like any other revolution, the “Generativity Revolution” will require economic and political power. The “Encore Infrastructure” group (http://www.encore.org/community/groups/encore-infrastructure)is attempting to develop a vision of “infrastructure” necessary to support needs of the encore community, so that they can participate in this revolution. This infrastructure is also necessary to network and strengthen independent ventures within the encore career movement.